Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Dieter Zakas" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > At the risk of sounding defensive, I'm not, as you put it, "sniffing
> > around
> > this newsgroup for answers" I "won't accept." I was wondering whether
> > anyone
> > knew of anything "concrete" regarding the topic of my post, and what its
> > current verdict is.
> >
> > I accept the fact that science has gray areas, and that nothing is
> > certain;
> > however, science regularly proves and disproves research, and this is no
> > exception. My question is, how many of us on this NG are scientists, and
> > qualified to comment on this (alleged) teflon-aluminum-dementia link?
> > Opinions are one thing, but they don't answer the question of the question
> > I
> > originally posed.
> >
> > Dieter Zakas
> > --
>
> I am a scientist and responded with definitive information about this
> question. Did you not read it?
>
"Science" is currently out of favor with the American citizenry.
Many don't have room in their small minds for both faith, and believing
that the best way to know empirical reality is to try to prove your own
assumptions incorrect.
>
> --
> Peter Aitken
> Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

Thanks for your kitchen myths page.

--Bryan http://MySpace.com/BoboBonobo