"Dutch" is even fooled by himself! :-)
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:03:42 GMT, "Dutch" > wrote:
><dh@.> wrote
>
>> I'm aware that the lives of livestock should be given as
>> much or more consideration than their deaths
>
>Why should the deaths of livestock be given any consideration?
__________________________________________________ _______
From: Jonathan Ball >
Message-ID: .net>
the deliberate killing of animals for use by humans DOES deserve
moral consideration, and gets it.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
__________________________________________________ _______
From: Dieter >
Message-ID: . net>
ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any moral consideration.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
__________________________________________________ _______
From: Rudy Canoza >
Message-ID: et>
"giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of their deaths
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
__________________________________________________ _______
From: "Dutch" >
Message-ID: >
they are a direct result of activities which humans undertake for their
own benefit. Since we cause these events to happen as a direct result
of feeding ourselves we must bear some responsibility for the deaths.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
LOL!!! Again we have proof that you are fooled even by yourself,
and by Goo too in this example, you poor stupid fool.
|