SlipperySlope wrote:
> homo shitbag HIV+ Ron Hamilton wailed:
> > Dutch wrote:
> >
> >><dh@.> wrote
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 Goo wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Try answering them now, ****wit: WHY are you so
> >>>>obsessed with livestock, in particular, "getting to
> >>>>experience life"?
> >>>
> >>> I'm aware that the lives of livestock should be given as
> >>>much or more consideration than their deaths, and/or the
> >>>lives of wildlife.
> >>
> >>Why more consideration? Why should livestock get so much of this
> >>"consideration" of yours?
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Why do you think it is "better" for
> >>>>the individual livestock animals to exist rather than
> >>>>never exist?
> >>>
> >>> Some of them have lives of positive value and some
> >>>do not
> >>
> >>That's not an answer ****wit. You have no answer.
> >
> >
> >
> > You are an
>
> **** off, Ronnie, you punk-ass felcher.
>
> No animals "benefit" from "getting to experience life".
> The only thing from which you'd benefit is a sock in
> the jaw. **** off, punk.


delivered by a 4 foot tall, 300 lb. dwarf who prances around in
Victoria's Secret lingerie and terrorizes women?.........I think not.

Now go play with your gerbils Goo.