View Single Post
  #176 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
Autymn D. C.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Would you like to be eaten?

pearl wrote:
> "Autymn D. C." > wrote in message oups.com...
> > pearl wrote:
> > > * The greater the variety of plant-based foods in the diet, the greater
> > > the benefit. Variety insures broader coverage of known and unknown
> > > nutrient needs.

> >
> > a tautology

>
> I don't see any.


You would if you understood your own words.

> > > * Provided there is plant food variety, quality and quantity, a
> > > healthful and nutritionally complete diet can be attained without
> > > animal-based food.

> >
> > a tautology--

>
> No.


Yes.

> > one can live healthily for many months on an all-meat
> > diet, as well.

>
> Ipse dixit, and false. Even truly carnivorous animals
> like dogs cannot live healthily for long on meat alone.


You proven liar, dogs are omnivores; cats are carnivores. And bones
and marrow are a meat, so your blurb is irrelevant.

> Even Atkins 'dieters' are allowed some plant foods, yet;
>
> 'Atkins "Nightmare" Diet


This one suffers from my later comment about fat and milk. Go away
whither you get a brain. I don't uphold Atkins's diet either.

> > > * The closer the food is to its native state - with minimal heating,
> > > salting and processing - the greater will be the benefit.

> >
> > The littler the benefit omnivores such as us

>
> Humans are a frugivorous species.


Then why don't some humans eat fruits? Are they not humans, retard?
Humans are omnivorous.

> > will get therefrom, as
> > they cannot be as digestible. Why does Moby lisp so much?

>
> Humans have teeth with which to crush and pulp food;
> breaking indigestable plant cell walls, releasing nutrients.
>
> And your 'digestible' animal proteins?


Worts would be more digestible if we still had wisdom teeth and
appendix, but we don't. We moved on from ruminants.

> 'A carnivores gastric juice is highly acidic, serving to prevent
> putrefaction while flesh undergoes digestion. Plant-eaters


Stomach acid is good for killing germs; it's part of immunity to
botulism and the ilk.

> prior to the flesh putrefying. The human digestive tract is
> corrugated for the specific purpose of retaining food as long
> as possible until all nutriment has been extracted, which is the
> worst possible condition for the digestion and processing of
> flesh foods. Meat moves quickly through the carnivores


Humans not having ready fangs or spades must deal with less and fewer
food.

> digestive tract and is quickly expelled. The human lengthy
> intestine cannot handle low-fiber foods including meat and
> dairy very quickly at all. As a consequence, animal foods
> decrease the motility of the human intestine and putrefaction
> almost invariably occurs (as evidenced by foul smelling stools
> and flatulence), resulting in the release of many poisonous
> by-products as the low-fiber food passes through, ever so
> slowly. In humans, eventual constipation may develop on a
> meat-centered diet. Colon cancer is also common, both of
> which are rare or non-existent on a high-fiber diet centered
> around raw fruits and vegetables.


Putrefaction is done away with by drinking less to have greater acid.
Of course, one needn't eat as much flesh as worts to get the same
nutrition, so gutly backup happens in the overgrown. Inner germs wreak
many cancers; kill them early and most will be fine.

> > > 'Am J Clin Nutr 1999 Sep;70(3 Suppl):532S-538S
> > > Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease,
> > > and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California

> > [snip]

>
> Typical.


Don't cascade.

> > See the "variety" argument of yours and apply it to meats. The
> > diseases come from milk and fat,

>
> There is at least 6% saturated fat content in lean meat.


Saturated fat is good:

The Truth About Saturated Fat,
<http://www.mercola.com/2002/aug/17/saturated_fat1.htm>.

The health problems most have happen in the poor, who thrive on cheap
starches and fats (oils in this case). There are pricier but better
choices in both the fleshly and wortly.

> > and not from /fleshes/.

>
> And you call others illiterate? The word is 'flesh'.


The many is "fleshes", dolt.

> > I hear that buffalo is lean and good...

>
> 'According to Harper's Biochemistry, the putrefaction bacteria
> in the large intestine convert amino acids from undigested protein

(rebutted bacteria argument)

(snipped robotic output)
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=parties


-Aut