This meat industry shill (rick==Dutch) stated dirt after my first post.
When I had enough, I made t the mother ****er eat some of his own dirt.

rick wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ups.com...
> > The meat industry must be desperate to come up with all kinds
> > of wacky
> > claims about the "evils" of not eating meat produced by cruel
> > and
> > unhealthy factory farming and slaughterhouses. All people have
> > to do is
> > to look at videos of cruelly cages animals and the filth and
> > cruelty
> > that goes on in the slaughterhouses. It is impossible to argue
> > against
> > the evidence and that is the reason for the wacko arguments.
> > Does it
> > work for anyone other than those working for the meat or
> > rendering
> > industry?
> > ==========================
> Thanks for again proving your hatred and delusions, hypocrite!
> Keep up the good work.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > rick wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >> > Dutch==rick the same mother ****ing asshole
> >> > Do not start dirt you mother ****ing asshole unless you are
> >> > ready to
> >> > eat some.
> >> ====================
> >> Thanks for yet again proving that you care nothing about
> >> unnecessary animals death and suffering, hypocrite. Keep up
> >> the
> >> good work! It's vegan loons like you that will prove to
> >> everyone
> >> how depraved the adherents to a disorder are, killer.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Dutch wrote:
> >> >> "Dave" > wrote
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dutch wrote:
> >> >> >> "ant and dec" > wrote
> >> >> >> > Dave wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Martin Willett wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> ant and dec wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> Martin Willett wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> How about a Willett of cowards?
> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> What (apart from the obvious) is your problem?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> He's just demonstrating that he learnt from the
> >> >> >> >> humour
> >> >> >> >> lecture you just gave us:-)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Exactly. - It's also useful, as demonstrated by this
> >> >> >> > case
> >> >> >> > to test a
> >> >> >> > person's hypothesis by reflecting it back and gauging
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > response.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > He dishes out undeserved derogatory collectives nouns
> >> >> >> > as
> >> >> >> > a 'joke';
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Derogation richly deserved, as you are demonstrating.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > yet is less willing to see that 'joke' when it's
> >> >> >> > played
> >> >> >> > on him.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You used his Proper Name in your slimy low-blow retort,
> >> >> >> his
> >> >> >> humor used
> >> >> >> general definitions.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What differenece does it make? Martin's joke was made at
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > expense
> >> >> > of all vegans. Ant and Dec's counterjoke was made only at
> >> >> > the expense
> >> >> > of Martin.
> >> >>
> >> >> The difference is, a joke made about a group, such as
> >> >> Liberals, or gays, is
> >> >> a parody on attitudes or ideas that are arguably typical of
> >> >> that group.
> >> >> Implying that vegans in general are smug is a far cry from
> >> >> calling a person
> >> >> a coward by his name. I can't believe I needed to explain
> >> >> that
> >> >> to you Dave.
> >> >
> >