View Single Post
  #161 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan
rick
 
Posts: n/a
Default mindless vegan petro-chemical whore without a clue...


> wrote in message
ups.com...
> The meat industry must be desperate to come up with all kinds
> of wacky
> claims about the "evils" of not eating meat produced by cruel
> and
> unhealthy factory farming and slaughterhouses. All people have
> to do is
> to look at videos of cruelly cages animals and the filth and
> cruelty
> that goes on in the slaughterhouses. It is impossible to argue
> against
> the evidence and that is the reason for the wacko arguments.
> Does it
> work for anyone other than those working for the meat or
> rendering
> industry?
> ==========================

Thanks for again proving your hatred and delusions, hypocrite!
Keep up the good work.





>
> rick wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> > Dutch==rick the same mother ****ing asshole
>> > Do not start dirt you mother ****ing asshole unless you are
>> > ready to
>> > eat some.

>> ====================
>> Thanks for yet again proving that you care nothing about
>> unnecessary animals death and suffering, hypocrite. Keep up
>> the
>> good work! It's vegan loons like you that will prove to
>> everyone
>> how depraved the adherents to a disorder are, killer.
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Dutch wrote:
>> >> "Dave" > wrote
>> >> >
>> >> > Dutch wrote:
>> >> >> "ant and dec" > wrote
>> >> >> > Dave wrote:
>> >> >> >> Martin Willett wrote:
>> >> >> >>> ant and dec wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> Martin Willett wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> How about a Willett of cowards?
>> >>
>> >> >> >>> What (apart from the obvious) is your problem?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> He's just demonstrating that he learnt from the
>> >> >> >> humour
>> >> >> >> lecture you just gave us:-)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Exactly. - It's also useful, as demonstrated by this
>> >> >> > case
>> >> >> > to test a
>> >> >> > person's hypothesis by reflecting it back and gauging
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > response.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > He dishes out undeserved derogatory collectives nouns
>> >> >> > as
>> >> >> > a 'joke';
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Derogation richly deserved, as you are demonstrating.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > yet is less willing to see that 'joke' when it's
>> >> >> > played
>> >> >> > on him.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You used his Proper Name in your slimy low-blow retort,
>> >> >> his
>> >> >> humor used
>> >> >> general definitions.
>> >> >
>> >> > What differenece does it make? Martin's joke was made at
>> >> > the
>> >> > expense
>> >> > of all vegans. Ant and Dec's counterjoke was made only at
>> >> > the expense
>> >> > of Martin.
>> >>
>> >> The difference is, a joke made about a group, such as
>> >> Liberals, or gays, is
>> >> a parody on attitudes or ideas that are arguably typical of
>> >> that group.
>> >> Implying that vegans in general are smug is a far cry from
>> >> calling a person
>> >> a coward by his name. I can't believe I needed to explain
>> >> that
>> >> to you Dave.
>> >

>