Life per se does not have a positive value
dh@. lied:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:36:44 GMT, Leif Erikson wrote:
>
> >dh@. lied:
> >
> >> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:36:53 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>dh@. lied:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:31:11 -0700, Louis Boyd > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Leif Erikson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Either they benefit from their life or they don't.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>No animal benefits from coming into existence. Period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Humans don't either. They have to make something of their lives for
> >>>>>their lives to be of benefit to themselves or other.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you feel that's true for other animals as well? If so, please
> >>>>explain how your limitation
> >>>
> >>>He doesn't have a "limitation".
> >>
> >>
> >> LOL! Yes he does
> >
> >No, he doesn't. He doesn't have a "limitation" that
> >prevents him from correctly thinking about animals.
>
> You are completely
He doesn't have a "limitation" that prevents him from correctly
thinking about animals. YOU have one.
|