View Single Post
  #73 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural,sci.agriculture
dh@.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Life per se does not have a positive value

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:36:44 GMT, Goober dishonestly believed:

>dh@. lied:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:36:53 GMT, Leif Erikson > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dh@. lied:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:31:11 -0700, Louis Boyd > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Leif Erikson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Either they benefit from their life or they don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No animal benefits from coming into existence. Period.
>>>>>
>>>>>Humans don't either. They have to make something of their lives for
>>>>>their lives to be of benefit to themselves or other.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you feel that's true for other animals as well? If so, please
>>>>explain how your limitation
>>>
>>>He doesn't have a "limitation".

>>
>>
>> LOL! Yes he does

>
>No, he doesn't. He doesn't have a "limitation" that
>prevents him from correctly thinking about animals.


You are completely lost on this one, you poor stupid Goober.