On 16 Nov 2005 Goo desperately lied:

>I'm not an "ara".
>
>> insist that life has no value for any animals or
>> humans regardless of quality,
>
>No animal or person "benefits" from coming into existence.

YOU/"ARAs" insist life can not have positive value for farm animals
because you believe "the deliberate killing of the animals erases all of it",
regardless of quality of life and the humaness of their death.

>> >> The living
>> >> animals lives are morally significant because they indicate how we treat the
>> >> animals.
>> >>
>> >> >>Combining egg and sperm for the purpose of creating a product
>> >> >>involves no sacrifice, no "consideration" of the well-being of any animal.
>> >> >>Those are the morally relevant concepts in this equation.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>The rest is just more of your rubbish.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can contribute to the lives they get, or try not to.
>> >>
>> >> And if their lives are not decent then you shouldn't. You don't make any
>> >> effort to ensure that they are.
>> >
>> >Or, if you decide mostly for health but partly for aesthetic reasons
>> >not to eat meat, you also shouldn't.
>>
>> These quotes explain how YOU/"ARAs" want everyone to feel
>> about raising animals for food
>
>I'm not an "ara".

LOL! Of course I can't believe that Goo. But notice I've been
insulting myself by accomodating YOU and your boy by adding
the / between YOU and "ARAs"? Yes, I'm sure you noticed,
but you just don't appreciate any grand gesture like that.