wrote:
> <snip>
>
> Andy: Instead of invoking God to duck out of another opportunity to
> engage
> in intellectually honest discourse,

GOD is the truth which should be the goal of any intellectually honest
discourse.

> why don't you simply explain the
> evidentiary basis for your assertion "science and the scientific method
> are two different things."

Those who have reading comprehension do not need evidence to comprehend
the differences in the meanings of different words.

> To clarify to you, I actually comprehended the above quoted
> sentence,

Then you do not need an explanation of it.

> but you
> have not clarified the evidence or reasoning for this (dubious)
> assertion, which is what I was asking you when I asked you to
> "clarify."

Comprehension requires no clarification.

> If you insist in ducking out, I would submit this is a symptom of
> the larger problem with your behavior on these NGs.

Problems do not have symptoms.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest you here next
week:

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the Lord has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D5217EA
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?W13A4250B
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129