On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:01:50 -0800, Don Kirkman >
Huffed and Puffed the following into the madness of usenet:

>It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
>article >:
>
>>"Bob (this one)" wrote:
>
>>> Oh, look. It's our old friend nospam6. Yet another handle among the
>>> several to evade all those killfiles. So urgent is his need to post
>>> something - anything - that he can't even keep his online identities
>>> straight.
>
>>Actually, an email address is **not** an alias. Google will testify
>>that the nospam6 email address has been around the block a few times
>>enough to prove your false witness.
>
>Of course it's an alias; Webster says "alias" means "otherwise called"
>or ""otherwise known as" so it is "an assumed name." How is nospam6 NOT
>one of those? How long it's been used has nothing to do with what it
>is.
>
>He that is not truthful in small things should not be trusted to be
>truthful in large things.


of course it's an alias, it was put in the AUTHOR field when posted.
chung is nothing but a liar.