It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article >:

>"Bob (this one)" wrote:

>> Oh, look. It's our old friend nospam6. Yet another handle among the
>> several to evade all those killfiles. So urgent is his need to post
>> something - anything - that he can't even keep his online identities
>> straight.

>Actually, an email address is **not** an alias. Google will testify
>that the nospam6 email address has been around the block a few times
>enough to prove your false witness.

Of course it's an alias; Webster says "alias" means "otherwise called"
or ""otherwise known as" so it is "an assumed name." How is nospam6 NOT
one of those? How long it's been used has nothing to do with what it
is.

He that is not truthful in small things should not be trusted to be
truthful in large things.
--
Don Kirkman