Other guy wrote:
> When did I say that child rape and animal abuse deserved the same penalty?

So you dont understand The Rule of Law. Its NOT the penality dopey, its
the *enforcement of it*

How do you intend to ultiminately enforce your so called and bogus
animal rights if you are not going to treat and or threaten a dog
beater in the identical manner as a rapist? With a gun??

What you are saying is, that IF both a dog beater and a rapist, BOTH
tried to defend their freedom, BOTH would deserve to die.

That sunshine makes you worse than the ****en dog beater. How dare you
value an animal's life over that of a human, you pig.

I would gladdly shoot to kill a rapist who tried to defend his freedom,
could you *honestly* say that you would be glad to shoot to kill a dog
beater who was trying to defend his freedom?

> > Based on WHAT as the standard or morality?
>
> The standard of morality that values human decency over sadistic pleasure,

Struggling to understand the question I see. ****head YOUR morals have
no standard, they are based on whimsical ****en nonsense.

>
> Wrong, I have a moral obligation to support laws to protect all innocent
> animals,

scoff scoff so animals can be innocent and guilty now? You beeen
watching too much tele mate, Mr Ed cant really talk.

Yeah Lassie is clever, but not that ****en clever she wouldn't bite
your ****en hand off, for playing with her during her meal times.

> just as I support the laws that protect your children.

Until they start work and then you want to threaten them with death if
they dont abide by your equally as idiotic ****en tax laws, you're a
****en liar and a dozey dopey socialist hypocrite.


Michael Gordge