Dutch wrote:

> "Derek" > wrote
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:48:34 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>"Derek" > wrote
> >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:19:54 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>>><dh@.> wrote
> >>>>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:08:07 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >>>>>><dh@.> wrote
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> You "ARAs" decide
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>You know I'm not an ARA
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How could I even suspect that you might not be?
> >>>>> All evidence I've got is that you are.
> >>>>
> >>>>You know I'm not an ARA
> >>>
> >>> Yet only a couple of days ago you once again claimed
> >>> that animals do hold rights against us,
> >>
> >>Yes, they do.
> >
> > Then you advocate rights for animals, which proves
> > that Harrison and I are correct about you: you're
> > an ARA, liar Ditch.
>
> An ARA who believes that eating meat is moral.. hmm..
>
> You can't have it both ways Derek, you claim I'm lying when I deny I'm an
> ARA, and I'm lying when I say I recognize rights in animals. The more you
> spin the deeper the hole you dig for yourself.
>
> How's Aristotle doing these days btw?

I was just wondering the same question. Derek did go very quiet on
us when we demonstrated that the animal deaths associated with
meat production were per accidens using the definitions he
provided didn't he?