Chef Juke > wrote:
> Kevin S. Wilson > wrote:
> >Chef Juke > wrote:
>
> >I really don't much care about intention. I've had it with ... all the
> >other self-important bozos who think that they have some sort of
> >God-given right to shove their message down our throats. ...Quit
> >hollerin' at me
>
> Um, Kevin?
>
> Of the 62 posts in this thread, the original poster made 6 posts,
> while you have made over twice as many (13). In comparing those posts
> I think it fair to say that any impartial observer would find yours to
> be far more agressive, negative and some (including a number of the
> A.F.B. regualars who have responded, offensive.
>
> In your messages to both to the original poster and to those who you
> disagree with you repeatedly make assumptions about their INTENT
> (which you say you don't care about) and use these assumptions to
> bolster your arguments against them:
> For example:
>
> KEVIN: "You think that your message is so important that you can
> ignore prohibitions against spamming, including those in your ISP's
> Acceptable Use Policy"
>
> Do you really think that the original poster was both aware of and
> intentionally disregarding their ISPs Acceptable Use Policy?
>
> You often resort to name calling ("self-important bozos", "racist",
> "ignorant racist" "WebTVe", "You are a sad, pathetic, creepy little
> man.", etc.), yet chastise other when they resort to the same.
>
> It also seems that as threads you are involved in get longer, your
> statements in them become more pedantic - you start focusing on a
> minot point ( that someone did not answer one of your questions)
> rather than the overarching point of the thread.
>
> If the whole intent of your posts with this recurring theme (pointing
> out to people that they are spammers) is to educate people to the
> error of their ways, as indicated in your eigth post in this
> particular thread:
>
> "It really is simple: You're spamming. "
>
> ..then I have just one question for you.:
>
> Couldn't you find a more constructive way to do it?
>
> You have repeatedly chastised those who take you to task for your
> approach and have repeatedly been hypocritical in doing so. You have
> ridiculed those you consider "ignorant" rather than attempt to
> constructively educate them.
>
> Finally, based on the years of such threads, is seems clear to me that
> ultimately, you simply don't care to engage with others in a
> reasonable, respectful manner, especially if they have said or
> implied something that you disagree with, or if you deem them somehow
> 'less' than you (ignorant, racist, etc.).
>
> To me, that seems like a truer form of ignorance than unintentionally
> breaking one's ISP Acceptable use policy while trying to help people
>
Big Jim said it better, but I'm proud to know you Chef Juke!

--
Nick. Support severely wounded and disabled War on Terror Veterans and
their families:
http://saluteheroes.org/ & http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

Thank a Veteran and Support Our Troops. You are not forgotten. Thanks ! ! !