"jmcquown" > wrote in message
.. .
> Peter Aitken wrote:
>> "JimLane" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> For those decrying shooting looters here's some of the reason they
>>> should be shot on sight (and, fortunately, were):
>>>
>>> New Orleans police kill looters in shoot-out
>>> By Mark Egan Sun Sep 4, 9:26 PM ET
>>>
>>> NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - New Orleans police killed four looters who
>>> had opened fire on them on Sunday as rescue teams scoured homes and
>>> toxic waters flooding streets to find survivors and recover
>>> thousands of bloated corpses.
>>>
>>
>> It continues to amaze me that you and some others are so festeringly
>> stupid that you cannot tell the difference between someone who is
>> shooting at the authorities and an unarmed person who is looting.
>
> Peter, did you read the post? "New Orleans police killed four looters who
> had *opened fire* on them on Sunday". They weren't just looting, they
> were
> shooting at police and rescue personnel. Like there isn't enough to deal
> with without gang-bangers thinking it's okay to steal everything in sight
> and then start shooting when they are caught.
>
> Jill
>
>

THAT IS MY PRECISE POINT FER CHRISSAKE!! I have explicitly said that I agree
it is OK to shoot people who are firing on authorities. You and others have
said expicitly that it is OK to shoot someone for JUST LOOTING. If you do
not see the difference between an unarmed person who is stealing a TV and a
person who is shooting at the police (and may or may not have been looting
too) then you are truly beyond help.


--
Peter Aitken