wrote:
> That's why Physicians' Committee for Responsible Medicine was
> formed

No, it wasn't. PCRM was formed as an outgrowth of animal rights groups,
not medical groups. Physicians make up less than five-percent of PCRM's
membership.

http://www.amprogress.org/News/News.cfm?ID=360&c=63

> .......as an antidote to the tyranny of the AMA.

The AMA is not a tyrannical organization, it's a professional
organization committed to medical science. PCRM is a group committed to
ACTIVISM, not science or medicine.

Why have you still not replied to my last post about cholesterol (and
gout, etc.) in TPA and AAEV, chickenshit?