You said in other posts you didn't give much credence to the medical
claims made by scientific research for puerh. So you accept a
meaningless factoid but not a body of work? You can't explain why
multiple infusions can cause caffeine reactions. I can. You can't
explain why puerh has no caffeine effects. I can.

Jim

Mike Petro wrote:
> Just for the record, you have NEVER heard me make a "medicinal" claim
> about puerh, ever, and explaining multiple infusions was never my
> argument. I can explain them I just cant find any hard scientific data
> on the subject.
>
> My argument was with your statement "I think caffeine is directly
> proportional to taste" and the Francis Leggett study, amongst others,
> proves otherwise, it's that simple and that's the extent of my
> argument. Arguing with you any further about it won't prove a thing,
> even when proof is presented you wont acknowledge it, so what's the
> point of arguing with you?
>
> Cheers Dude........