Nancy Young wrote:

>
> "nancree" > wrote
>
>> Nancy wrote"
>> Thank you. I find them amusing, others have said they do
>> as well. Anyone who doesn't think it's funny can just skip it. But
>> don't try to be some kind of censor.
>
>> Hi, Nancy,
>> I *don't" read them. I made that clear. My server prints the first
>> few lines, so it is clear Ubiquitous is at it again.
>
> Yes, to my amusement.
>
>> And you say,
>> "don't try to be some kind of censor." Seems to me that "you" are
>> trying to censor me !
>
> Absolutely not. You're telling someone to stop posting
> something you don't care for, and I'm saying, essentially,
> don't speak for me. You're happy to read stuff I don't
> care for, that is a ok with me. I'm happy to read stuff
> you don't like. And we both read stuff in between.
>
> What it boils down to is, you told Ub to give it a rest
> and I 'said' Hey, don't give it a rest, I was reading that!
>
>> C'mon now,-- neither of us are censors. We posters on RFC criticize
>> each other all the time. That's not censorship. That's just a family
>> squabble . <smile>
>
> It's no biggie, barely qualifies as a disagreement, I was just
> speaking up for myself.
>
> nancy

I think both of you need to step into the jello pit and settle this.