"cricket" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> "rick" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
>>
>> "cricket" > wrote in message
>> nk.net...
>> >i will again come back with the segment on public schools. if
>> >that movie is
>> > good for nothing else it shows that kids eat crap in school.
>> > why? maybe they
>> > like crap, maybe the schools didn't teach them, maybe their
>> > parents didn't
>> > teach them (more then likely) maybe their parents did teach
>> > them but there
>> > is nothing better to eat or to even try (most likely) that
>> > segment irked me
>> > so much i wanted to beat the crap out of a lunch lady.
>> ====================
>> Ahhh, the typical vegan compassion again rears its ugly head.
>> You guys are just too transparent, killer.
>
> wtf mate? are you refering to my impulse to slaughter a lunch
> lady? i don't
> know why vegitarianism and my lunch lady rampage have anything
> in common.
> ====================
Because veggie loons try to claim they feel such empathy and
compassion for animals. They pretend that none die for their
food. But when faced with a real situation, your hatred comes
out and exposes you for the hypocrite you are.



>>
>> > > wrote in message
>> > oups.com...
>> >>
>> >> I saw "Super Size Me." The filmmaker (can't remember his
>> >> name) is a
>> >> very appealing guy, and is great on camera. Somebody that a
>> >> lot of
>> >> people could imagine being their friend. And his
>> >> filmmaking
>> >> style is
>> >> easygoing and something that might change minds, not the
>> >> shrill, angry
>> >> feeling you get from a lot of agitprop. Not entirely
>> >> unlike
>> >> Michael
>> >> Moore in the early days, when he was making good films like
>> >> "Roger and
>> >> Me" instead of ill humored stuff like he makes now. (Yes,
>> >> I
>> >> know there
>> >> were a lot of problems with "Roger & Me" but it's still
>> >> leagues ahead
>> >> of what he does now.)
>> >>
>> >> The problem with "Super Size Me" is that it's ultimately
>> >> unconvincing
>> >> self promotion. Yes, I realize the filmmaker has some
>> >> point
>> >> to make
>> >> about how food is marketed, but at the end of the day the
>> >> subject of
>> >> the movie is the filmmaker himself, who is doing this as a
>> >> way
>> >> to make
>> >> a name for himself. So, he basically does a stunt, in which
>> >> he
>> >> deliberately tries to eat so much that he literally vomits
>> >> every day
>> >> for a month, while eating McDonald's food. Critics can
>> >> easily
>> >> dismiss
>> >> what he did by staying that eating that much of anything,
>> >> even
>> >> if it
>> >> was a fat free vegetable diet, would make a person ill -
>> >> and
>> >> they'd be
>> >> right. So why does he do it? Because he wants to make
>> >> himself
>> >> famous,
>> >> and I guess in that respect the film is successful. But
>> >> it's
>> >> ostensible
>> >> reason for being is not convincing at all.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>