Skanky wrote:
>>>>Claire's self-crippled and morbidly obese Uncle Dreck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I've not turned down meals prepared for me by family
>>>>>>>>>>members or my friends just because they use foods I
>>>>>>>>>>normally don't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You DO turn down such meals
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>No, I don't refuse anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You TURNED THEM DOWN,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No
>>>>>
>>>>>Your
>>>>
>>>>No, fatso, I don't refuse anything. I gratefully accepted the rum cake
>
> Fatso?

Yes, he's morbidly obese.

> I'm detecting a fear

Then try getting out in a crowd and overcoming it, dummy.

>>>>and shared it with friends and family who like that kind of thing. As
>>>>far as my brother goes, the issue was framed with "IF." He knows I
>>>>wouldn't eat it, so he won't even offer it. We respect each other that
>>>>way, something which appears to be foreign in your Jerry Springer-esque
>>>>dysfunctional family. I find it amusing that you object more to sharing
>>>>a rum cake than sharing your wife with your own twin brother. Did you
>>>>hear David's belly slapping against Belinda's? Why do you object to
>>>>sharing rum cake but not to other blokes -- much less your own brother
>>>>-- shagging your wife?
>>>
>>>You snipped the evidence
>>
>>That wasn't evidence. I admit I shared the rum cake with family and
>>friends. The real question is, What would Dreck do if someone were to
>>offer him the same cake? Bear in mind he's such a twit that he shunned
>>black olives because he was misinformed about the brine in which they're
>>cured.
>
> What would you do

It wouldn't happen.

>> I used to eat black olives up until a few months ago, but
>> stopped after realising they swim around in squid ink, or
>> something close to it. I'm always ready to make changes to
>> maintain my ethical standard.
>> -- Derek Nash, http://tinyurl.com/dcyr3
>>
>>Would his "ethical standard" preclude him from eating a cake which
>>contained eggs and other ingredients of animal origin, or just olives
>>which he ignorantly believes "swim around in squid ink"? Would his
>>sanctimonious ethics preclude him from giving that cake to people whose
>>morals were a little looser than his own (like, maybe, his brother and
>>wife)?
>
> You seem awfully preoccupied with
> Derek's brother and wife, and their
> alleged affair.

It wasn't alleged. David mentioned it (http://tinyurl.com/n292) and
Dreck has confirmed it.

>>>You seem to have a preoccupation with fatness.
>>
>>It's not a preoccupation. Dreck has been kind enough to admit his weight
>>and even to post pictures of him sleeping with his dog (nothing untoward
>>shown in the pics or intended in my remarks). He further has admitted to
>>his insatiety when eating. As a result of his gluttony and lack of
>>exercise, he's become one of the world's fattest vegans. He's evidence
>>that veganism isn't inherently healthier than any other diet, only that
>>it comes with a lot of hollow sanctimony. I like to point to him when
>>people talk about how veganism is healthier or that vegans are slim and
>>trim. Vegans who don't over-eat may be, but so, too, are those
>>non-vegans who are sensible in diet and exercise.
>
> I still think

No, you never have. Your drug-addled mind is incapable of thought.