nemo wrote:
> <dh@.> wrote in message ...
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:35:40 GMT, Beach Runner > wrote:
> >
> > >Usual suspects has done nothing but be nasty.
> > >He has accused a member of my family of being a homosexual.
> > >He is CLEARLY not interested in VEGAN lifestyle or beliefs. He has
> > >stated he doesn't care about the suffering of animals.
> > >He calls Osteopaths quacks that teach at major universities.
> > >His constant insults accomplish nothing but make this a useless news
> > >group. It has a purpose, promoting and discussion of a vegan life, but
> > >his agenda is sick.
> > >He complains about removing unnecessary text, then when I post
> > >Dr. Greger's newsletter complains about the length.
> > >
> > >He is clearly a very sick, mean person and is now killfiled.
> > >
> > >I welcome discussions on vegan subjects.
> >
> > =B7 Vegans contribute to the deaths of animals by their use of
> > wood and paper products, electricity, roads and all types of
> > buildings, their own diet, etc... just as everyone else does.
>
> What part of "To a much lesser extent" don't you understand?
>
> > What they try to avoid are products which provide life
> > (and death) for farm animals, but even then they would have
> > to avoid the following in order to be successful:
> >
> Same old tosh!
>
> In other words you're saying if you can't stop contributing to the death =
of
> animals 100%, you shouldn't try for, say, 50%, 80% or whatever by not eat=
ing
> the poor buggers. This is illogical, it's rubbisha dn it's just a wind-up.
>
> So their's gelatin in paper, white sugar is refined using bone charcoal, =
and
> by law just about everything has to be tested using the infamous and larg=
ely
> ineffective LD50 test, the end is listless.
>
> It's not us Vegan's fault. We do our best and rubbish like yours isn't go=
ing
> to deflect us from this and iota.


exactly!!

Useless and etter can go to hell.