Since I was the originator of the quote, I feel I should say
that my intention was to say the "Queer guy" thing has gotten old and
stale.
The fact that these 2 were chosen in spite of their obvious
shortcomings said volumes about FoodTV's intentions. As for the
viewers voting, I want a recount! There is probably some "hangin'
Chad" to consider. ROFLMAO
DD

sf wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2005 11:46:52 -0700, wrote:
>
> > I completely agree with you guys that if the fact were that FoodTV
> > picked up the *** guys because they were *** (which I can believe as
> > being a marketing stint), then that is completely wrong/sad.
> >
> > I was only replying to
> > "
> > I'm tired of the queer guys now on Bravo, and I don't want "Queer
> > guys Cooking" on Food TV of all places. Big time mistake, IMO
> > D
> > "
> >
> > I firmly believe thats one sexual orientation is not a reason to get
> > attention. It is the work that produces results, like in this case
> > COOKING. I am glad that you guys think the same as well.
> >
> We all suffer from foot-in-mouth disease from time to time, so I'd
> like to think the true meaning of that post was what you just stated.