AlleyGator wrote:
> "Bob Myers" > wrote:
>
> >I don't think anyone's complaining about "queer guys teaching" -
> >but if they got picked BECAUSE they're "queer" (i.e., Food
> >Network execs saying something like "hey, we need our own
> >'Queer Eye'!") rather than on the basis of cooking ability or
> >expertise, then something's wrong here.
>
> I agree with this wholeheartedly. It's merely marketing - and yes,
> there's something wrong here - what about the others who put all that
> energy into it. They should have just been told "*** is the in thing
> right now, like reality shows - if you're straight, don't apply".
> Then, at least it could have been an all-out fair competition based
> only on the outcome, not the demographic.


What are you talking about? Where did you get the idea that whether
they are *** or not has anything to do with their success on the show?
Have you actually watched it?



Brian