jmcquown wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote:
> > jmcquown wrote:
> > I saw this child who was maybe 3 years old and the
> >> first words out of my mouth to John after they'd gone by were, "Oh
> >> tell me those weren't real tattoos." We saw the same family a while
> >> later and sure enough, this *toddler* has honest to god tattoos of
> >> dragons on his forearms. Okay, a three year old might be capable of
> >> expressing an extreme dislike for broccoli. But somehow I don't
> >> think this same child has the ability to decide oh yeah, I want
> >> dragons tattooed on my arms because I get to keep them for the rest
> >> of my life, unless I just want some really bad tattoo removal scars
> >> later. Yes, bring on the needles!
> >
> > Those are just rub-on temporary ones that kids use.
>
> I've seen the temp tattoos; these looked like the bonified real deal to us.
> And if so, shame on those parents.

Most tatoo places refuse to tat anyone under 16. At least all of them
I have ever been to do.

-L.