View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Bob (this one)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Nexis" > wrote in message
> news:YJqre.117$X71.61@fed1read07...
>
>>"Peter Aitken" > wrote in message
om...
>>
>>>"BeautyBuyNature.com" > wrote in message
egroups.com...
>>>
>>>>NOT GUILTY
>>>>
>>>He may not be guilty of child molestation, but he is most certainly
>>>guilty of being a no talent, nose-jobbed, bleached jackass. It is a total
>>>mystery how anyone can find him appealing. His performances are almost
>>>the definition of bad.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Peter Aitken

>>
>>I'm not a fan of his, but there are millions of people around the world
>>who find him to be very talented. I think he has BDD, and needs serious
>>therapy, but attacking him through his music is just silly. It may not be
>>your cup of tea, but that hardly makes him a "no-talent" performer.
>>

> Yes, and lots of people eat at McDonalds but that does not make it good
> food. Lots of people read romance novels but that does not make them good
> writing. Lots of people watch soap operas but that does not make them good
> drama. Need I continue?


Lots of people like Shakespeare. Lots of people like Michaelangelo. Lots
of people like French cuisine. Lots of people like Palladian
architecture. Need I go on?

"Good" is a *subjective* evaluation. I don't especially like MJ's music,
but he sure does put on a show. That moon walk is pure poetry in motion.
But I also think he's irredeemably weird and wouldn't walk across the
street to go to a concert of his.

Pastorio