This isn't Dan, but I agree with you there Michael. I like the lines and the
symitry (yes I know it's spelled wrong, i don't have my dictionary handy at
the moment...) and the classic 'tea pot' ness of the older and the old style
designs.
Marlene
"Michael Plant" > wrote in message
...
> Dan 5/26/05
>
>
>> To: Alaric,
>>
>> I have a website where you can view some of my teapots while my eBay
>> store carries several more to choose from.
>>
>> http://www.silkroadtrade.com/teapots.htm
>> http://stores.ebay.com/silkroadtrade <-- better
>> selection
>>
>> If you do decide to make a purchase but don't have an eBay account, no
>> worries. Just contact me through e-mail and we can do business that
>> way.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Dan
>>
>> SORRY EVERYONE. I don't mean to spam. Just that I couldn't reach
>> Alaric at his regular e-mail address. Thanks in advance for the
>> understanding.
>>
>
>
> Dan,
>
> No apology required. We'll just consider this fortuitous and
> informational.
>
> I had bought several pots from Dan. They are slip molded, well made,
> eggshell thin, and wonderful for the Dan Congs of Phoenix Mountain. They
> are
> also growing quite beautiful over time. Personally, I like the simplest
> most
> classic designs; I don't like the modern geometric and animalmorphic
> types.
> That's just my taste. These fancy ass pots seem to have become the norm
> among the "masters" of late, probably following the market. Dan, what's
> your
> opinion of this?
>
> Michael
>