"Boron Elgar" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:52:05 -0000, "pearl" >
> wrote:

> >http://www.rense.com/general46/proofa.html
>
>Rense is garbage. Why not improve your quoting source...say, from
>Drudge? The Washington Times, perhaps? Maybe one of Murdock's
>tabloids?

Whatever you think of any particular news service is besides the point.

>AND you have no dates for new studies. YOu are drawing on old info and
>missing the point. If this were an avenue worth pursuing, if there
>were some validity to this, it would be studied and shown with numbers
>from later studies. It isn't.

The research at the above link isn't 'old'. You're lying through your teeth.