"It was offensive and, worse, not even funny at all.

nancy "

See, I don't see why it's offensive. I see that it is tasteless, and
that's what I
intended.

Comments about same sex encounters in prison are a staple of discussion
of prison life.
Whether it's jokes about dropping the soap, or ugly tirades about some
criminal getting
what he deserves by having to dance with bubba, the subject always
comes up when discussing
men in prison.

So is it wrong to transfer this to women in prison? I don't think so.
Good for the goose.

The term then? It's vulgar, but it just doesn't have an edge to it.
It's not degrading, because the act
itself isn't degrading. It's not especially disgusting, because
neither word in the phrase calls up images of
unclean or unhealthy items. You could as easily say "Wig Kisser" or
"Merkin Gourmet"

It's not even a phrase used in anger. When people are insulting
*******s, the term of choice is "Dyke".

No, It isn't an offensive term. It is a 12-year-old-boy mildly
ignorant lockeroom josh. It's tasteless and innapropriate.
So is a party themed around poking fun at someone's questionable
incarceration. It wasn't highly amusing, but
it wasn't a complete bomb either. It appealled to the other
12-year-old boys in the group, and trust me, that's just about
all of us at one moment or another.

As for Damsel's question of whether or not I'm a *******;

1.)well, I cook, clean, bake pastries, am good at dressing myself and
picking out curtains, use moisturizer, enjoy fragrant handsoap,
and am intimate with a woman. I have quite a bit in common with at
least some *******s.

2.)Are you? If not, I'm not sure you get to be offended for them.

Greg Zywicki