> > No one's made the conclusion that it's lack of
> > need means immorality.
>
> Pay attention to vegetarian rhetoric, it is frequently argued that
since we
> don't *need* meat then therefore we *should not* consume it. I don't
have a
> quote, but I'd bet money that you have said that yourself.

No I haven't. It's a ridiculous statement. I
don't need rolled oats, does that mean I
should not have them?

No veg*n that I've ever known thinks that
not a need = should not eat.

> > The immorality is
> > seen instead in the brutal conditions and the
> > killing of the animals.
>
> That's another aspect of vegan rhetoric.

No, that pretty much sums up the 'rhetoric'.


--
SN
http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/
A huge directory listing over 700 veg recipe sites.
Has a fun 'Jump to a Random Link' button.