> wrote
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:03:34 -0500, "Scented Nectar" >
> wrote:
>
>>> > We disagree.
>>>
>>> You are wrong. Ethics is not personal. It can't be.
>>
>>Of course they can be. The dictionary
>>says "Motivation based on ideas of right
>>and wrong." That sounds quite personal.
>
> The Gonad is the *perfect* example of absurdity in
> regards to ethics. His primary objective is to prevent
> people from giving the animals even basic consideration.
> He tries to accompish that by lying and with incredibly
> childish insults and actions. He is the most dishonest,
> lowlife scum in the ngs, and *never* has anything of
> value to offer, yet he "thinks" people should have
> more than disgust and contempt for his views concerning
> ethics. If it weren't so pathetic, it would really be hilarious.

You have an open invitation to Dippy's streetcorner.