Skanky the Toronto whore wrote:
> > > The farmer is responsible.

YOU share responsibility.

> > > The consumer
> > > has only demanded the plant product.

She gets more than she bargained for.

> > > Due to lack of availlability, the consumer
> > > while technically complicit,

No, not "techinically". Just complicit, period.

> > > is in a position
> > > of forced complicity,

No. There is no force. You have a range of choices, and you refuse to
take any of them.

> > > which takes away
> > > any responsibility.
> > ====================
> > LOL You really don't understand anything you write, do you killer?
> > Keep up the good work proving your stupidity, hypocrite.
>
> It seems that YOU'RE the one who doesn't
> understand what I write.

We understand it all to well. You write hypocrisy.


> > > I have no land to grow my own food yet. You
> > > can call it lazy if you want,

It is.

> > > but I call it my
> > > retirement plan. Until then, it's not an option
> > > for me.
> > ==================
> > Ly It IS an option. It's just that YOU are too lazy and selfish
to take
> > that option. Proving yet again that animals take a back seat to
your
> > conveninece and entertainment. Thanks again, hypocrite.
>
>
> My life and career are such that I must
> live in the city.

There is no "need" for that; it's a want.