|
|
|
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message ...
> "pearl" > wrote in message
> ...
> > "Scented Nectar" > wrote in message
> ...
> > > "Ron" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > > In article >,
> > > > "Scented Nectar" > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > He has a point. I asked you to agree to compare all available
> > > foods
> > > > > against
> > > > > > one another, regardless of food type or category, a very
> > > reasonable
> > > > > request,
> > > > > > and something one would think a person in your position would
> be
> > > > > anxious to
> > > > > > do. You refused. Your excuse was that it "isn't fair", but
> nobody
> > > is
> > > > > buying
> > > > > > that. Just as with this survey, you are afraid that you won't
> like
> > > the
> > > > > > results.
> > > > >
> > > > > First of all, there's no data telling us
> > > > > the death toll of individual foods. Next
> > > > > you consistantly only want to compare
> > > > > the 'best' of meats to the 'worst' of vegan.
> > > > > When you want to compare like to like,
> > > > > I'll play the game too.
> > > >
> > > > They are relentless, aren't they?
> > >
> > > They go in circles and my head spins!
> > > All that misspent energy. 
> >
> > Believe it or not, they've been at it for ~years~!
> >
> > I've seen their 'arguments' trashed _repeatedly_.
> >
> > But here they are, still,.. for *more* punishment..
> >
> > They don't even see how self-harming they are.
> >
> > It's a mystery.
>
> I don't see what they are getting out of it. Do they
> like being hated and disliked? Do they enjoy
> being annoyances? They certainly can't expect
> people to take them seriously!
Like just said.. I won't repeat it.
|