uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote:

> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Ron" > wrote
>>
>>"Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>No, i demonstrated as I did above a case of insignificant cause. A vote
>>>>>has an effect, but it one vote in and of itself is insigniifcant cause
>>>>>in the determination of any election.
>>>>
>>>>So you invent your own meaning for the insignicant cause fallacy and
>>>>we're
>>>>supposed to just go along with it?
>>>
>>>Look it up.
>>
>>I did already but here it is again...
>>
>>http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/insig.php
>>"Thus, it is not a fallacy to say that you helped cause defeat the Tory
>>government because you voted Reform, for your vote had as much weight as any
>>other vote, and hence is equally a part of the cause."
>
>
> Intrepid software is not a recognized authority on the subject of logic
> or logical fallacies.

The author of the material contained at their site IS
an authority.

Once again, Ron, you lose.

Why did you **** your grandfather in the ass for three
days after he was dead, Ron? Did you have an illicit
key to the funeral home?