uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
engagement and wrote:

> In article t>,
> Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>
>
>>uncurious Ron AGAIN showed he doesn't really want adult
>>engagement and wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>It's much more than that, but that particular view of
>>>>it describes Skunky to a T!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What I type is entirely
>>>>>within in my control. To blame you for what I type would be a
>>>>>demonstration of child-like behaviour. "Mom, Rudy made me type it. Rudy
>>>>>made me angry."
>>>>
>>>>That's lovely. It also is wholly irrelevant to the
>>>>idea of shared responsibility for a recurring chain of
>>>>events in which you play an integral role, leading to
>>>>an outcome you may consider "wrong".
>>>>
>>>>Try to write something relevant.
>>>
>>>
>>>Who is responsible when you type "homo", "stupid" or such words, Rudy?
>>
>>I am responsible for the movement of my fingers across
>>the keyboard. You are responsible for the post you
>>write to which I reply. If someone were deeply
>>offended at the mere appearance of the word "homo", and
>>IF it was a given that I always replied to every post
>>you write by writing the word "homo", then you would
>>share in the offense taken by that person. This is
>>obvious: the word "homo" would always and only appear
>>in response to your posts. As far as that person is
>>concerned, you are causing the offensive word "homo" to
>>appear.
>
>
> Attributing responsibility to me for your actions.

No. Responsibility for an outcome.

Once again, you confuse action and consequence.

> Yes, Rudy. I am quite familiar the actions of children to avoid
> responsibility for their actions.

No, Ron. You aren't. You are still engaging in it.