In article >, "Dutch" >
wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article .com>,
> > "Rudy Canoza" > wrote:
> >
> >> dogmatically wrong Ron wrote:
> >> > In article >, "Dutch"
> >> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > The example is a case of insignificant cause.
> >>
> >> No, it is not. Once again, you are badly mistaken on terminology. The
> >> one person's vote may not be decisive, but it is significant.
> >>
> >> You really ought to know something about a topic before you begin
> >> running your mouth about it.
> >
> > In a city population of 3 million my vote is as significant as any other
> > vote. Unless the voting is one vote apart and I cast the deciding vote,
> > my cause in the situation is the same as anyone else's.
>
> You just did a complete 180.

No, i demonstrated as I did above a case of insignificant cause. A vote
has an effect, but it one vote in and of itself is insigniifcant cause
in the determination of any election.