homo felcher Ron wrote:
> In article >, "Dutch"
>
> wrote:
>
> > homo felcher Ron wrote
> >
> > >> Maybe some of them do, depending on who pays them. I would add
that
> > >> vegetarian advocates are quick to point out weaknesses in the
methodolgy
> > >> of
> > >> this particular research. Here is an example
> > >> http://www.vnv.org.au/Nutrition/SoyFoods.htm. So obviously more
> > >> confirmation
> > >> bias at work there.
> > >
> > > The net result of this conversation is that is a lot of
information the
> > > contradicts. To accept any information on the brain aging and
senility
> > > is then a choice.
> > >
> > > Oddly, each of the results confirming or negating the opinions is
done
> > > by "experts".
> >
> > Experts form opinions based on limited data. These opinions should
be
> > considered and held tentatively, neither accepted holus-bolus nor
rejected
> > out of hand. This kind of rational critical thinking is difficult
for many
> > people. People are uncomfortable with uncertainity, they tend to
want to
> > *know* if it is RIGHT or WRONG.
>
> A false dilemma of providing only two choices.

No, not a "false dilemma".

That really does seem to be a catch-all with you. Fundamentally,
little homo, you don't understand the meaning of the word dilemma.