"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> Claire's fat crippled Uncle Cuckold wrote:
>> On 27 Jan 2005 09:52:46 -0800, "Rudy Canoza" >
> wrote:
>> >Pixie Ron wrote:
>> >> In article >,
>> >> Derek > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Your continued snipping of my posts,
>> >>
>> >> Ray presented a logical fallacy.
>> >
>> >Ray did not present a logical fallacy. He did not present a
> dilemma,
>> >and the logical fallacy you claim he presented is the fallacy of
> false
>> >dilemma.
>>
>> You've conceded that the choices offered in the
>> scenario were restricted to just the two presented
>
> Yes. They are not a dilemma.
>
> Hence, you lose: no false dilemma, because no dilemma in the first
> place.
>
> You stupid fat ****.

Ray Wrote:

******** ~~Jonnie~~


You are a ****ing stupid ignorant bald headed dwarf. Your only dilemma is
what to call yourself.

One day you will lean the difference between COLLATERAL and ACCIDENTAL.
Don't blame us because you have been proved to be a bed ****ing, ignorant
nymshifting, shirtlifting duffer who makes life difficult for himself in
future postings. You have no argument now, the only thing you know about CDs
is that they give better reproduction than cassette tapes.

Or are you still on the 4 track jobbies? (About your era)

Blow it out of your arse ~~jonnie~~, but not in the direction of the UK.
>