Larry Fruity wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ups.com...
>
> > Because "biomass" is meaningless.
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=67&q=biomass

Cute. Well, not really; just stupid and idiosyncratic.

You STILL haven't explained why someone concerned with sentient life
should be concerned with "biomass", Fruity. And you STILL are whiffing
off from answering the question: should a person who IS concerned with
sentient life - and you have to accept his concerns as legitimate -
consider the deaths of 40 chimpanzees with a total "biomass" of 1800 kg
to be less bad than the death of one hippopotamus of 2200 kg?
Stop dodging and answer the question, Fruity.