On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:18:47 GMT, "misanthrope" > wrote:

>i don't condone the welshman's behaviour, but as you said yourself:
>
>> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
>> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
>> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
>> news groups are and we willingly participate in them.

It's morons like him who make it no better than it is imo.
I first approached your group ignorantly thinking you folks
had probably already been over this topic and had it pretty
much hashed out by now, only to find that none of you even
care about it. Later Boy Jones started bitching about the OT
garbage posted by the Gonad, so I tried to at least show basic
courtesy about it. And what did that get? A lot more childish
trash from BJ. At some point you mentioned the back-biting
issue, so I just let you know what the topic is again, ingnorantly
hoping this group would have something to offer.
For years I've been pointing out that some farm animals
benefit from farming, and it's been met with supposed opposition
the entire time. But the "opposition" is nothing. If I'm wrong,
and in some mystical way no farm animal has ever benefitted
from farming, I would like to find out. If life has never been a
benefit for anything, I'd like to find that out too. But. I'm not going
to find out from clowns like Dutch or the Gonad...they have done
their best, which as I said is nothing. I'm interested to see if
anyone can do better than nothing. Or if I'm right, I'm interested
in seeing if anyone can explain to these morons that some of
the billions of farm animals have benefitted from farming, and
some have not, in a way they are capable of understanding.
And/or that life is the benefit which makes all others possible,
in a way they can understand. I've explained that without the
benefit of life a zygote could never grow into an animal, and
even an easy basic fact like that is beyond their ability to
understand.