In article . net>,
Rudy Canoza > wrote:

> It IS related to complicity. You are flatly wrong
> about that. They view the meat eater not just as
> complicit in the death of the animals he eats, but the
> prime cause. They are correct, too. That's why they
> can't get away with claiming NOT to be complicit in the
> deaths of the animals killed in the course of producing
> the foods they eat.

Which demonstrates how common it is for people confuse cause and
coincidence.

Given/remorse guilt can be experienced whenever there is an assignment
of wrongdoing and since emotions are often illogical, it is quite
another position to be arguing that they are experiencing emotions and
logically viewing notions of complicity.