c5 wrote:
>>re. your P.P.P.S.:
>>Yet you make them out of "Boddingtons, Tetley's and Caffrey's"?
>
>
> Not sure what you mean.

That's obvious.

> There are two things, to me, about quality, with regard to creating
> something that will be part of a home's decor. In this case quality is
> two fold: aesthetic and taste.
>
> [...]
> There are several reasons why I would use a term like "the likes of
> Budweiser et. al." For everyday drinking in a bar or when coming home
> from work and quenching your thirst, "the likes of Budweiser et. al."
> are fine. But as far as, in this context, making what I consider
> (dubious or not) a piece of art who would want to use a generic
> mass-marketed, corporate "logo" that exemplifies cheap production and
> poor taste? Bud, Michelob, Heinekin, Zima etc. -- hyped up imagery more
> than simple quality.

Are you suffering from the delusion that the likes of Boddington's,
Tetley's, and Caffrety's are anything but mass-produced industrial
beers, and not so very different from the boring mass-produced lagers
and FMB you mention? Boddington's is nitro-canned flavorless crap,
Tetley's is bland and dull, and Caffrey's is little better than the
other two. They are closer to the likes of "Bud, Michelob, Heinekin,
Zima etc." than you apparently realize.
--
dgs