"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>> > "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>> >> In your example you created a false impression in that person's mind,
>> >> that's
>> >> all. It has nothing to do with a real immoral act, apart from your
>> >> lying.
>> >> All your demonstration shows is that people can be fooled into
>> >> believing
>> >> something false.
>> >
>> > Believing something false....like moral codes and theories of
>> > complicity.
>>
>> You can't just deceive someone then announce that means moral codes and
>> theories of complicity are false.
>
> Just like the dupe who can experience false beliefs for a watch that was
> never stolen, some folks are very receptive or easily convinced of their
> accountability for the actions and consequences of others.

Non-sequitor, the fact that someone believed your lie does not indicate
anything about the validity of the principle of complicity. You're grasping
again.