"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote
>>
>> >> Imagine that. Two different 'moral codes' existing simultaneously. The
>> > vegan who _chooses to believe_ that it is unacceptable to kill some
>> > animals for their food and the meat eaters who _choose to believe_ it
>> > is
>> > acceptable to kill some animals for their food.
>>
>> That would be fine if that were the case, but it isn't. The vegan
>> hypocrisy
>> is that although they *profess* to believe that it is unacceptable to
>> kill
>> animals for their food, their actions invalidate this claim. Vegans pay
>> people to kill animals willy-nilly to preserve their steady supply of
>> cheap
>> food.
>
> Name the vegan and the person they paid to kill what animal? I bought
> tomatoes last week, who did I pay and what did they kill?

The vegan's name was Dolores, she paid Pedro the farmer and the animal was
Ferdinand the mouse. You paid Juan to kill a lizard.

Just as suspected, nonsense is not very interesting, why do it?