wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:35:52 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> > wrote
> >
> >> [(il)logic of the larder]
> >
> >Well done! Thanks for posting that again, it does such a beautiful
job of
> >illustrating the sophistry of "The Logic of the Larder".
>
> Later on

No, there is no "later on". Salt makes his excellent points

- that the pig was bred for the philsopher's benefit, not the pig's;
- that life per se is not a benefit to the pig
and then he moves on. There is no "later on" to Salt's essay.