"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article et>,
> "rick etter" > wrote:


snippage...


>> >
>> > CHOOSE TO. No one has to do anything unless they've chosen to do it.
>> =====================
>> Very good, little boy. Now, if you choose to do one thing, buying cheap,
>> clean, conveninet veggies that you know causes massive animal death and
>> suffering, while claiming to to be doing all you can to reduce
>> unnecessary
>> death and suffering to animals, you are at the least, hypocritical, and
>> most
>> likely ignorant to boot. Choice is the whole point here. Vegans choose
>> based only on the simple rule for their simple mind, 'eat no meat.'
>> Despite
>> the fact that they claim that animals are the primary goal.
>
> I'm not responsible for what others do. I don't control what they do.
====================
Again, very good. However, you are responsible for the chopices you make.
Making choices that you know causes the actions that you claim to want to
avoid is hypocrisy, or in your case, justplain stupidity.


>
> The second flaw in your reasoning, once again, is this silly notion that
> one must do all to conform to a logical argument.
========================
Logic is really tough for you, isn't it pansy-boy?

We covered this with
> the example of sodomizing children. Since you and I have time to
> exchange witticisms then, we are not doing all that is possible to
> protect children, ergo we must think it okay for children to be
> sodomized. That is the product of your reasoning, Rick.
======================
Nope. You failed, yet again. But that's not surprising, is it fool? I;m
not currently engaging in the action and claiming it to be bad. Vegans
are. That's where the logic fails you fool.


>
>> The
>> > vegan CHOOSES to avoid killing animals which they accomplish.
>> ======================
>> And your proof of this delusion is, pansy-boy? I await your cites.
>
> Aw, another person who is going to google us to death. Cut and paste is
> a poor substitute for a reasoned argument.
====================
LOL You have neither, fool.


I offered to examine
> statistics, each time being declined.
========================
I thought so. You have nothing to back up your ignorant delusions. thanks
for the admission, queer-boy.


>
>> The grower
>> > CHOOSES to kill animals such as birds, frogs, etc.
>> =====================
>> At the behest of the consumer fool. In this case, the vegan loon who
>> has
>> already made it a point of making grandious claims of not killing
>> animals.
>> The vegan *could* make choices that don't require the death and suffering
>> of
>> animals, but the ones here on usenet do not make those choices,. The
>> vegan *could* choose a grower that chooses not to cause death and
>> suffering,
>> or become his own grower, but agaibn, the usenet vegan doesn't. He's too
>> into looking for scapegoats to ease the guilty conscience they have.
>> Afterall, as long as they can focus all their energy on what they think
>> others are doing, they can conveninetly ignore their own bloody
>> footprints.
>
> Behest? You do make me laugh. They are my minions after all. I control
> all the food growers with a single thought. I want and they must
> respond. They have no choice. They must kill. I control their arms and
> their equipment. I AM ALL POWERFUL. I think of meat or throw down a few
> dollars and suddenly growers the world over feel compelled to respond to
> my needs. They are my pawns in this delicious game of control that I
> exert over everyone.
==================
lack of intelligent response, noted.



>
>> >> Now would you like to
>> >> > mention a few vegan farmers who are producing. Or will you continue
>> >> > to
>> >> > make generalizations out of desperation.
>> >> ==================
>> >> LOL It's you that has been free with the generalization, pansy-boy.
>
> Ah, the true mark of a coward. Will you threaten me with violence next?
=======================
I see your comprehension problem is still in effect, eh fool?




snippage...