"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >, "Dutch" >
> wrote:
>
>> "John Deere" > wrote in message
>> ps.com...
>> > Ron wrote:
>> >
>> >> Any one who can 'dissociate' themselves from the act of putting a
>> > bullet
>> >> in the head of an animal, or electrocuting them, or stabbing,
>> > shooting,
>> >> etc. without the presence of emotions is psychologically impaired to
>> > a
>> >> certain degree.
>> >>
>> >> Keep em busy and keep em away from me.
>> >
>> > That's extremely lame a "justification".
>> >
>> > Except for hunters-by-choice, people associated with
>> > meat production aren't particularly psychologically
>> > impaired in the way you are presenting.
>> >
>> > It's a job that some of them happen to fall into.
>> > In fact, some people associated with meat-farming
>> > get very disturbed, and do end up veg*n.
>> >
>> > You should actually talk to some of them before you
>> > put them all down like that, and present them as psychos.
>> >
>> > Why this need for "justifications" anyway? Why not
>> > a more honest "I think vegetarianism is moral,
>> > it's just that I can't do it personally?"
>> >
>> > There are people who are that honest, you know.
>> > They gave vegetarianism/veganism a try, and then
>> > decided they just couldn't do it. But they don't
>> > go around badmouthing veg*ns and coming up with
>> > highly irrational arguments. They just say they
>> > tried and couldn't do it.
>> >
>> > A little bit of honesty can go very far.
>>
>> Ron is a troll and a time-waster, he doesn't believe a word he's saying.
>
> Your continued ability to read my mind, to know my thinking and my
> beliefs is just awe-inspiring. Do it again.

OK, you are either a colossal idiot or you are playing a little game of
devils-advocate. I haven't figured out which.


>> I may disagree with you, but at least I believe that you actually hold
>> the
>> convictions you express.