"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article et>,
> "rick etter" > wrote:
>
>> "Ron" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article et>,
>> > "rick etter" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Ron" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > In article et>,
>> >> > "rick etter" > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "John Deere" > wrote in message
>> >> >> oups.com...
>> >> >> > Dutch wrote:
>> >> >> >> Can you eat grass, silage, waste and by-products? Every pound of
>> >> >> >> meat
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> produced from those plentiful sources is food that would be
>> >> >> > unavailable
>> >> >> >> otherwise. That food would likely be replaced by commercially
>> >> >> > produced,
>> >> >> >> inferior tofu/rice/vegetable substitutes causing the deaths of
>> >> >> >> yet
>> >> >> > more
>> >> >> >> animals.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But you didn't address the point -- any effects of vegan meals
>> >> >> > are multiplied hundreds of times in meat meals.
>> >> >> ==================
>> >> >> Nope. Again you have it backwards. Ir is far to easy to show
>> >> >> meat-included
>> >> >> diets that are better than your vegan diet, killer.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please do.
>> >> ====================
>> >> Then learn to use your computer and read them, pansie.
>> >
>> > What has the education of a nation come to when a reasoned response
>> > amounts to...google it.
>> > ==========================
>> When the idiot making stupid demands doesn't have the knowledge to find
>> out
>> before hand what they are supposedly spewing about, it tells us the level
>> of
>> *your* education, pansy-boy. Thanks for proving again that you have
>> nothing...
>
> Google us up another load, big boy.
>
> I'd appreciate seeing your links that require a human (vegan in this
> case) conform to a theoretical construct.
=================
Thanks for proving you have no idea what you're talking about, pansy-boy.