"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> usual suspect > wrote:
>
>> Fudge-packer Ron wrote:
>> >>>>>>>I have no way of knowing what farmers do what.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>Stop feigning ignorance and innocence. You know they intentionally
>> >>>>>>poison them and less intentionally run over and flood them.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>I don't know which do this, if they really do.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Bullshit. You know that most farmers don't employ the tactics of the
>> >>>>Lundbergs to clear the fields of migratory birds (but not rodents,
>> >>>>amphibians, etc.). You know that the use of pesticides kills a
>> >>>>variety
>> >>>>of non-targeted species. You know that storage facilities like
>> >>>>granaries
>> >>>>and warehouses pro-actively employ pest control measures in
>> >>>>accordance
>> >>>>with health agency requirements.
>> >>>
>> >>>Well then, any educated fool
>> >>
>> >>Glad you're here to speak for the educated fool community.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>can see the difficulty is not in veganism
>> >>
>> >>It *is*, but an educated fool is still a fool.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>but in the whores who are the growers and farmers.
>> >>
>> >>Whores who cut certain corners to fulfill even *more whorish* consumer
>> >>demand for the least expensive products possible. Most consumers care
>> >>nothing about dead mice or rats or frogs, they just want their food.
>> >>Vegans, who brazenly lie about the impact their diet has on animals,
>> >>have failed to address the issue of alternative production which might
>> >>actually help their consumption match their rhetoric. They're
>> >>hypocrites
>> >>of the grandest magnitude.
>> >
>> >
>> > You still suffer the delusion that other must follow your standards.
>>
>> I insist others who pontificate about such things make some effort to
>> meet or exceed their own standards.
>
> I see. So your expectations of others are higher than your own
> expectations of yourself.
=====================
Nice strawman, pansy. He never made any such claim. Nice of you to try to
project onto others the idiocy you spew though.


What have you done about the moral wrong of
> sodomizing children and premeditated murder.
========================
Analogies are really really hard for you, aren't they pansy? First and
foremost he doesn't participate in the action, unlike the vegan that claims
that killing animals is wrong and yet does nothing to alleviate the death
and suffering they contribute to. So, he's already far ahead of vegans.
Second, the strawman you built gets knocked over easily since he has never
claimed to live his life in a way that reduces and'or eliminates child
abuse. Again, that's the basis of the vegan religion.
You really are too stupid for this, pansy. Maybe you should just hang out
with the other pansies in your semi-literate phi. group.


You were in the chain of
> those "great minds" who disagreed with these acts as immoral as I recall.
>
>> > The vegan is free to make a logical argument to support animal rights
>> > and
>> > to
>> > operate as a human within a human world.
>>
>> I haven't questioned their freedom (or right) to engage in hypocrisy.
>> I've only called them on it.
>
> Hmmmm.