In article t>,
"rick etter" > wrote:

> "Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >,
> > usual suspect > wrote:
> >
> >> Fudge-packed Ron wrote:
> >> >>>>>I have no way of knowing what farmers do what.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Stop feigning ignorance and innocence. You know they intentionally
> >> >>>>poison them and less intentionally run over and flood them.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I don't know which do this, if they really do.
> >> >>
> >> >>Bullshit. You know that most farmers don't employ the tactics of the
> >> >>Lundbergs to clear the fields of migratory birds (but not rodents,
> >> >>amphibians, etc.). You know that the use of pesticides kills a variety
> >> >>of non-targeted species. You know that storage facilities like
> >> >>granaries
> >> >>and warehouses pro-actively employ pest control measures in accordance
> >> >>with health agency requirements.
> >> >
> >> > Well then, any educated fool
> >>
> >> Glad you're here to speak for the educated fool community.
> >>
> >> > can see the difficulty is not in veganism
> >>
> >> It *is*, but an educated fool is still a fool.
> >>
> >> > but in the whores who are the growers and farmers.
> >>
> >> Whores who cut certain corners to fulfill even *more whorish* consumer
> >> demand for the least expensive products possible. Most consumers care
> >> nothing about dead mice or rats or frogs, they just want their food.
> >> Vegans, who brazenly lie about the impact their diet has on animals,
> >> have failed to address the issue of alternative production which might
> >> actually help their consumption match their rhetoric. They're hypocrites
> >> of the grandest magnitude.
> >
> > You still suffer the delusion that other must follow your standards.
> =====================
> LOL You still don't have a clue, do you, fool? It's not 'our' standards
> that they should follow, it's their own, idiot. The ones they make big
> pronouncements about and then never even try to live up to! You really are
> this stupid, aren't you? And all this time I thought you were just playing.
> One too many packings, eh pansy?

Ugh. Once again, please enlighten us on the requirements of humans to
follow the theoretical construct or logical argument.

*awaits the latest google"

> The
> > vegan is free to make a logical argument to support animal rights and to
> > operate as a human within a human world.
> >
> > There is a name for such a logical fallacy, but I'm not that interested
> > in remembering or looking it up at the moment.